We don’t need labels on genetically modified foods | by @washingtonpost editorial board http://wpo.st/10pA0
-
-
Replying to @calestous
“
@calestous: We don’t need labels on genetically modified foods |@washingtonpost editorial board http://wpo.st/10pA0 ” cigs used 2b safe1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @waynomiller
@waynomiller Cigs were never safe.@washingtonpost1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @calestous
@calestous@washingtonpost that's my point. The so called experts used to say they were.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @waynomiller
@waynomiller Do you think foods derived from nuclear and chemical mutagenesis are safe?@washingtonpost1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @calestous
@calestous@washingtonpost I don't believe they are safe.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @waynomiller
@waynomiller Would then require them to be labeled based on their nuclear and chemical mutagenesis?@washingtonpost3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @calestous
@calestous@washingtonpost Yes. We should be allowed to make conscious decision. I dont disagree that some may choose not to buy.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@waynomiller They can made safer if cooked in dihydrogen monoxide (DHMO) which is safe to consume at low quantities @washingtonpost
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.