I prefer the other direction. I prefer open peer review where reviewers names are listed on published papers. @calestous @nature @NatureNews
-
-
-
Here is a good example of why reviewers should be public.
@calestous@nature@NatureNews http://theenergycollective.com/simonlomax/2189526/new-york-fracking-ban-throws-peer-review-under-bus … -
The other is that reviews lately have been declining in quality. Nothing like reviews from 30 yrs ago.
@calestous@nature@NatureNews
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.