@calestous @compoundchem I've come to the conclusion: The more sensational the headline, the less likely it is to be true. #science
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@calestous@compoundchem or you could just watch to see what@michaelpollan or@drvandanashiva RT...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
HT
@calestous: A rough guide to spotting bad#science via@compoundchem#chemistry pic.twitter.com/jp2l7OBXet#publichealth#NHS@NICEcomms
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good.
@calestous A rough guide to spotting bad#science via@compoundchem#chemistrypic.twitter.com/cdyufhqTYR
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Useful guide to scientific results “
@calestous: A rough guide to spotting bad#science via@compoundchem#chemistry pic.twitter.com/5rWL8Kx1zC”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Watch out for these in the news too!“
@calestous: A rough guide to spotting bad#science via@compoundchem#chemistry pic.twitter.com/1YzQCCbV8T”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@calestous@StevenShorrock@compoundchem except #6 implies that 'science' can't happen with small n research. Qualitative research does. -
@allspaw@calestous@compoundchem Pretty much a positivist spin.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@calestous@ESGkpnr@compoundchem Okumak lazım.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@calestous@IlonaKickbusch spot what@ProfGlantz does ( clue - all of it)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@calestous@compoundchem 1. If results are replicable Ignore all 12 points.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.