Should credible #journalism ignore rifts in #scientists’ views on #safety of #GMOs? Join the debate: http://shar.es/I9M8Y #GM
-
-
Yes indeed. “
@calestous:@AgBioWorld Serious journalist shld review balance of evidence, not simply listen to din of rhetoric.@SciDevNet” -
@DocCamiRyan
@calestous@AgBioWorld How does a journalist 'review balance of evidence' - is he/she an expert? What constitutes a 'review'? -
@SciDevNet See ----> Impartiality and accuracy of@BBC#science coverage http://bbc.in/1bXFmVq @DocCamiRyan@AgBioWorld -
@calestous@BBC @DocCamiRyan@AgBioWorld and yet the BBC comes under fire for giving space/time to climate sceptics... and defends its moves -
@SciDevNet It was not about giving space but about handling evidence.@BBC @DocCamiRyan@AgBioWorld
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@AgBioWorld In anti-science journalism one denialist is enough to 'counterbalance' hundreds of studies.@SciDevNet#IPCCThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.