@sacrisis @Clear_Food @gibberplain @IanAndersonLOL You lump all experts together as if they're are a race. Focus on evidence.
-
-
Replying to @calestous
@calestous@sacrisis@Clear_Food @gibberplain That's exactly what you do! Scientific consensus exists for a reason! it's a powerful tool1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IanAndersonLOL
@IanAndersonLOL@sacrisis@Clear_Food @gibberplain Scientific consensus is about the balance of evidence, not personal opinions.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @calestous
@calestous@IanAndersonLOL@sacrisis @gibberplain 100+ completely independent, peer reviewed studies show GMO safety http://goo.gl/qqMmqJ1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Clear_Food
@Clear_Food@IanAndersonLOL@sacrisis @gibberplain These exclude review studies by the National Academy of Sciences.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @calestous
@calestous@Clear_Food The NAS (A vehicle of scientific consensus) also concludes there is no evidence that GMOs are unsafe.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@IanAndersonLOL @Clear_Food It is better to read the studies than to double-guess them.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.