"Sachs Attack": @Whynationsfail responds to @JeffDSachs's review in @ForeignAffairs. Your move, Professor. http://michaelkbusch.wordpress.com/2012/11/22/sachs-attack/ …
-
-
Replying to @michaelkbusch
@michaelkbusch political inclusion does little to predict economic growth. Their theory is has little explanatory or predictive power.2 replies 4 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JeffDSachs
.
@JeffDSachs on prediction, fair point, tho@whynationsfail itself notes the difficulty in establishing predictive value. No grand claims.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @michaelkbusch
@michaelkbusch nearly empty theory. If institutions are slow to change and account for growth they should have predictive power, but don't1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JeffDSachs
@JeffDSachs We heard a lot about the singular force of property rights. This is just a revised version of same reductionism.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @JeffDSachs
@JeffDSachs There are many rules that govern soccer. But studying them does not help predict who will win the World Cup.1 reply 9 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @calestous
@Calestous@JeffDSachs@cblatts That's because all teams are playing by the same rules. Countries are governed by different institutions.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
@DavidJandura @JeffDSachs @cblatts Studying soccer rules won't tell why France was knocked out of the last World Cup.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.