VIB on Seralini. Worth reading exp for S. supporters. http://www.vib.be/en/news/Documents/20121008_EN_Analyse%20rattenstudie%20S%C3%A9ralini%20et%20al.pdf … @GMOjournal @GMOEvidence @EarthOpenSource @Calestous @gmopundit
@BBBugie @GMOjournal @GMOEvidence @EarthOpenSource @gmopundit This study should be taken seriously--by examining the data.
-
-
@Calestous Data disclosure conditions are clear: http://bit.ly/SHCfvm (point 3) -
@EarthOpenSource@Calestous EFSA asked for the data but the exp design is helplessly flawed. You cannot ask regul. revis. inventing results -
@BBBugie@Calestous Interesting, which results did Seralini invent? He must be a magician, truly. -
@EarthOpenSource@Calestous like the link NK603 & tumors? Tweaking the statistics until you have the desired result is a sort of, isn'it? -
@BBBugie@Calestous No stat analysis of tumours 2 tweak because this not carc study. Increased tumours noted as per OECD chronic tox. -
@EarthOpenSource@Calestous but want to use tumor data anyway, isn'it? The tox stat is also peculiar. Nobody said fraud. Just useless exp. -
@BBBugie@Calestous U said Seralini invented results. OECD says note tumor data in chronic tox expmt. Seralini did. U don't like, tell OECD. -
@EarthOpenSource@Calestous Problably he should also have followed OECD guidelines, right? I don't understand if you believe in what U write - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.