@MaxMckeown @calestous Of course not. Such an interpretation is insulting.
-
-
Replying to @tom_peters
@tom_peters@calestous I certainly wasn't insulting you... just wanted bring your experience into the exploration of a question...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MaxMckeown
@MaxMckeown@calestous My credo: Act your way into thinking beats think your way into acting.4 replies 6 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @tom_peters
@tom_peters@calestous Tend to agree, acting (while thinking) can lead to (faster) learning; the best combination is 'thinking-action'...1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @MaxMckeown
@MaxMckeown@calestous Action is a data generator. Unless you're Einstein, thought experiments don't get you very far.3 replies 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tom_peters
@tom_peters@calestous Many firms develop an 'obsession for doing' that masks inertia (and often lack of understanding) of new ideas...4 replies 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MaxMckeown
@MaxMckeown@tom_peters@calestous I concluded that the levers u thought u were pulling as a leader were usually not attached to reality.3 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @milouness
@milouness@tom_peters@calestous Yes. Formal leaders can be decisive (yes/no) without improving actions (or outcomes!)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MaxMckeown
@MaxMckeown@tom_peters@calestous in field of national security making quick decisions gets lots of style points: I.e. don't look weak2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @milouness
@milouness@tom_peters@calestous Shoot first, ask questions later. Sell first, ask questions later. Litigate first, ask questions later...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@MaxMckeown @milouness @tom_peters When asked to think outside the box, start with action: destroy the box. Then experiment.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.