I would guess that certain ideas and outcomes are appealing to sponsors looking for a potentially untrue outcome and support their business purposes. Scientists like money as much as anyone else.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Science in crisis.
-
the world we live in is total scam manipulated by the elites that have become to powerful and a few own everything
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Have to imagine at least some of the changes described herehttps://worksinprogress.co/issue/the-speed-of-science/ …
End of conversation
-
-
-
What if this study isn’t replicated?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This often happens when results support what people want to believe, especially when the topic has political implications. Reviewers nit-pick when results do not support their beliefs, and ignore obvious flaws when they do.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's like the MSM, they have to report SOMETHING, some 'new' thing that is supported by general crack pot opinion and they can't expend much time retracting and rebutting which doesn't have the same 'excitement quota'
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.