Caitlin Johnstone ⏳ on Twitter: "This lack of a satisfactory explanation was accounted for by the aforementioned Engineering Assessment by Ian Henderson, which concluded the cylinders were manually placed. None of this in either Interim or Final Reports.… https://t.co/sdD36e5CRc"

Country	Code	For customers of
United States	40404	(any)
Canada	21212	(any)
United Kingdom	86444	Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
Brazil	40404	Nextel, TIM
Haiti	40404	Digicel, Voila
Ireland	51210	Vodafone, O2
India	53000	Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
Indonesia	89887	AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
Italy	4880804	Wind
3424486444	Vodafone
» See SMS short codes for other countries

Caitlin Johnstone ‏ @caitoz 14 Dec 2019

pic.twitter.com/OZJWEDpdrQ

1 reply 29 retweets 92 likes

Show this thread

Caitlin Johnstone ‏ @caitoz 14 Dec 2019

This would be the Ian Henderson memo referred to in the Daily Mail article. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7793253/PETER-HITCHENS-reveals-evidence-watchdog-suppressed-report-casting-doubt-Assad-gas-attack.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ico=taboola_feed …pic.twitter.com/N0y1jbjgd6

1 reply 30 retweets 93 likes

Show this thread

Caitlin Johnstone ‏ @caitoz 14 Dec 2019

This would be the Documents Registry Archive (DRA) that per Hitchens an OPCW official was referring to when he sent out an email saying "Please get this document out of DRA … And please remove all traces, if any, of its delivery/storage/whatever in DRA".pic.twitter.com/CdKUoznuLp

1 reply 34 retweets 95 likes

Show this thread

Caitlin Johnstone ‏ @caitoz 14 Dec 2019

From Hitchens/Daily Mail:pic.twitter.com/VkLFj8pkTj

2 replies 34 retweets 102 likes

Show this thread

Caitlin Johnstone ‏ @caitoz 14 Dec 2019

So to recap, Ian Henderson is an OPCW inspector who went to Douma, ran some experiments, and concluded that the cylinders alleged to have been dropped by Assad helicopters were rather manually placed, i.e. staged. An OPCW official actively had his report purged from the registry.

6 replies 146 retweets 277 likes

Show this thread

Caitlin Johnstone ‏ @caitoz 14 Dec 2019

OPCW inspector tries to argue to FFM team leader Sami Barrek that the low levels of chlorinated organic chemicals need to be reported to avoid misrepresentation and confusion. Barrek says he'll unilaterally overrule the inspectors and omit the information. https://wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/document/Omission_of_ppb_levels_in_Interim_R_on_6-July/page-2/#pagination …pic.twitter.com/norATrlc7l

2 replies 54 retweets 131 likes

Show this thread

Caitlin Johnstone ‏ @caitoz 14 Dec 2019

Inspectors were saying concentrations of chemicals found need to be included to keep people from reading the Interim Report as concluding that a chlorine gas attack occurred. Those concentrations were never once included in either the 2018 Interim Report or the 2019 Final Report.pic.twitter.com/eQlgAPCaIh

1 reply 46 retweets 120 likes

Show this thread

Caitlin Johnstone ‏ @caitoz 14 Dec 2019

Caitlin Johnstone Retweeted Caitlin Johnstone

This is all coming out on the same day an ex-Newsweek journo revealed that multiple editors (one of whom had CFR ties) shut down his attempts to report on previous OPCW revelations, citing the assertions of a debunked Bellingcat article as their reason.https://twitter.com/caitoz/status/1205929394390196224?s=20 …

Caitlin Johnstone added,

Caitlin Johnstone @caitoz

This Newsweek reporter's story on the OPCW scandal was rejected by his editors because of a ridiculously bogus article by Bellingcat, which I debunked here: https://consortiumnews.com/2019/11/27/narrative-managers-faceplant-in-opcw-scandal-spin-job/ … https://twitter.com/Tareq_Haddad/status/1205896390179774465 …

6 replies 87 retweets 161 likes

Show this thread

Caitlin Johnstone ‏ @caitoz 14 Dec 2019

This extremely important bit of information from the first draft of the 2018 Interim Report was excluded from the official publications of both the Interim Report and the Final Report. https://wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/document/FirstdraftInterimReport/page-3/#pagination …pic.twitter.com/9qHKndxAmI

1 reply 51 retweets 120 likes

Show this thread

Caitlin Johnstone ‏ @caitoz 14 Dec 2019

Would've been nice to know this information too. Excluded from both the 2018 Interim Report and the 2019 Final Report.pic.twitter.com/DSmHMKUsBc

3 replies 38 retweets 99 likes

Show this thread

Caitlin Johnstone ‏ @caitoz 14 Dec 2019

This lack of a satisfactory explanation was accounted for by the aforementioned Engineering Assessment by Ian Henderson, which concluded the cylinders were manually placed. None of this in either Interim or Final Reports.pic.twitter.com/RHF98UuOa9

6:32 PM - 14 Dec 2019

39 Retweets
108 Likes

3 replies 39 retweets 108 likes

1. Koen‏ @KoenSwinkels 14 Dec 2019
  Replying to @caitoz @wikileaks
  
  I know a certain "independent* international collective of researchers, investigators and citizen journalists" that has a lot of apologizing and explaining to do... *USG funded
  
  1 like
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

Tweets

Caitlin Johnstone

@caitoz

Tweets

Loading seems to be taking a while.

false

Saved searches

Tweets

Caitlin Johnstone ⏳

@caitoz

Tweets

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

Promote this Tweet

Block

Tweet with a location

Your lists

Create a new list

Copy link to Tweet

Embed this Tweet

Embed this Video

Preview

Why you're seeing this ad

Log in to Twitter

Sign up for Twitter

Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

Confirmation

Welcome home!

Tweets not working for you?

Say a lot with a little

Spread the word

Join the conversation

Learn the latest

Get more of what you love

Find what's happening

Never miss a Moment

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Promoted Tweet

false

Caitlin Johnstone