You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Cohen argues that social media platforms should be subject to the same kind of paternalistic censorship as television.pic.twitter.com/BJxzqnmAfC
Cohen simply glosses over the single most important question about internet censorship, "Where do you draw the line?" He just doesn't answer it. People like me, who aren't racist but voice unauthorized ideas, would inevitably be silenced in an environment of greater censorship.pic.twitter.com/8PHYxBQP9O
Cohen argues that social media posts should be treated more like a writer submitting an article to an editor for approval, to allow time for thorough censorship.pic.twitter.com/oemmLvcYsZ
Cohen is in alignment with most Hollywood activism: well-intentioned but entirely power-serving. The echo chambers these wealthy celebrities all wind up in gives them dumb beliefs like the status quo is great and must be protected at all cost, even literal government censorship.
That’s the point. This has nothing to do with stopping racism.
"Racism" is as imprecise and elastic a charge as the infamous Article 58 of the 1936 Criminal Code of the USSR. "Give us the man, we'll make the case," was the slogan of NKVD interrogators.
Umm, but Zuckerberg has authorized FB to remove many alternative viewpoints but still allows voices of racism & holocaust denial. Fscebook already censors much, but as it is, he determines what is acceptable, instead of subjecting it to a publicly accountable forum?
What kind of frigging artist is Cohen if he supports censorship? A bought 1% sycophant. Censorship is not the answer. Tulsi isn't kicking her opponents out of debates, she is towering over them by being right. We don't need censorship. We need spines to stand up to bullies.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
