And lastly, a few notes & thoughts. First, the supporting information file is worth a read: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/ajpa.23308/asset/supinfo/ajpa23308-sup-0002-suppinfo2.docx?v=1&s=caf54d8109a0e9b0582d257a49aa8a719b82f23a … In particular, it incl >
-
-
Original article states there are no typically feminine objects in grave. None. This has to have been done on purpose? This absence may be..
-
just as important as what is there. Emphasising the incumbent is exactly like the male counterparts, an effort to ensure there is no...
-
discrimination between her grave & others. Implies the woman is viewed as much of a warrior by those who buried her as the other male...
-
deceased. Her compatriots emphasising a non dicriminatory point in her chosen grave gds which ppl today should mirror in assessing these...
-
remains. A warriors grave like any other on the understanding that a warriors grave did not necessarily a warrior make. Though if female...
-
incumbent was anything like the character below taken from late 6thC Gaul I reckon she might have been quite formidable. Gregory of Tours..pic.twitter.com/4EelXUzWEZ
-
Indeed! And all good points, I think :)
-
The more I think,the more I feel the focus of attention should be on what is not there (no feminine gds in woman's grave) than what is there
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.