> Second, authors argue that shouldn't assume weapons buried in female graves=symbolic but those in male=indicative of warriors. However, >
-
-
> way' & 'interpretation should be made in a similar manner regardless of the biological sex of the interred individual'. >
Show this thread -
> In my view, it's a fascinating paper; caveats possible+important to note re: exact interpretation (see above), but it is worth defending.
Show this thread -
In sum, I don't have major issue w/ paper, I don't think you should either, & some critiques go too far; see alsohttps://twitter.com/preshitorian/status/907186879656873986 …
Show this thread -
Essentially, amount of scepticism we exhibit over interpreting 581 as a warrior should be similar to that which we'd show if they were XY :)
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@BritishPodcast needs to see this thread... ? RT@caitlinrgreen: > And finally, authors make important point that 'Male individuals ... >Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.