I think I'd tend to concur with James Gerrard's view on it (tho' lack of theory worries me less!) — in particular, his note in review that >
-
-
> works cited, incl several that show Sawyer wrong, they've not been fully read...) Perhaps would have worked better as study of Leicester?
-
Rereading it just now, I'd love to say I've altered my view, but can't I'm afraid: v unsatisfactory both re: prior research & the evidence >
-
>, not properly engaging w/ either. Some interesting general ideas & points re: towns, but v v wary given treatment of L.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.