Thanks, I'll send you a DM :) Have to say find this fascinating! Not least because seems diametrically opposed to conclusions of Arrhenius >
-
-
Replying to @caitlinrgreen @xeimevta
>, based on the 'cement cloisonné', & more importantly Adams, who argued in her PhD (http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.262849 …) & in much subsequent work >
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen @xeimevta
> (e.g. https://www.academia.edu/2614651/Garnet_Inlays_in_the_Light_of_the_Armaziskhevi_Dagger_Hilt …) that previous dominant view of garnet cloisonné as being of 'Germanic'/'barbarian' origin was wrong >
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen @xeimevta
> & best seen as Late Roman/Late Antique style evolving from lapidary traditions of the ancient world etc & diffused outwards from there… >
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen @xeimevta
> Cf also, e.g., https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=_IImDQAAQBAJ&pg=SA5-PA12#v=onepage&q&f=false …. Out of curiosity, does Buckton deal w/ issue of lapidary skills & Adams' other arguments against >
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen @xeimevta
> 'Germanic'/'Hunnic' etc origin for garnet cloisonné? And would an origin in the West work with fact that some of earliest garnet >
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
> cloisonné is from early to mid-3rdC Hatra in the east?pic.twitter.com/lmIUsfJOzD
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.