Doesn't say SSA, though, does it? Suggests North African - unless there's another passage in the paper you didn't exerpt...
-
-
Replying to @yourlyingeyes
The paper makes it clear in the text, but I agree not wholly clear in abstract! The paper discusses ppl of 'Sub-Saharan' ancestry, but >
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen @yourlyingeyes
> they are also referencing the most likely route of arrival (via North Africa) & using fordisc &c categories which term the 'Sub-Saharan' >
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen @yourlyingeyes
> reference populations 'African' (with a separate 'Egyptian' reference population). It's clear reading the papers, but perhaps not the >
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @caitlinrgreen @yourlyingeyes
> abstracts? Hope that helps :)
3:42 PM - 9 Aug 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.