Well, there are graves of Britons in Roman-era N. Africa and Near East, but I think the evidence we have suggests a significant degree of >
-
-
For the hunting dogs, the slaves and the tin, IIRC - was that Caesar or Agricola?
-
Now there's a question! All important; tin, fwiw, a consistent motivator over time from Bronze Age forward, it would seem!
-
And we all love a good hunting dog.
-
Indeed! But I wouldn't have travelled across an empire for months to get mine!

-
Very wise!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don't doubt they did. But as a hugely diverse place, i have huge doubts. Esp when several sites show concentration. Not all over.
-
I think the latter point is reasonable, just as it would be for today - major urban centres, military centres, coastal areas etc seem >
-
> to have highest degree of evidence, less elsewhere. But recognising likely variations across Britain doesn't mean that not significant >
-
> diversity to be encountered and at a potentially surprising number and variety of sites :)
-
I know you've mentioned DNA analysis fraught with difficulty. Yet, the diversity correlation between graves/DNA mix?
seems short
-
I think modern DNA evidence is genuinely v questionable as a source here due to methodologies etc, but too late to develop point, I fear :)
-
I understand what you're saying, plenty of evidence on auxiliaries, certain enclaves etc.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
