> minimum estimate of 11% of ppl in cemeteries there were of African ancestry, w/ 51% as possible max… see https://twitter.com/caitlinrgreen/status/744286383771127808 …. We get >
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
> and where we have evidence from other areas we find it there too. E.g. even in 'post-Roman' south Wales (5–7thC) we have likely African >
And I do very much appreciate you taking your time to chat about this! A couple of friends will be interested to hear about it!

No problem :) Hope it's interesting/useful! Fwiw, most fascinating recent study showed not only ppl of African origin in suburban London >
> (c.24% of sample tested) but also a small number of East Asians...! (Some DNA evidence for same in Roman Italy, fwiw)
And tbh..who'd have left Africa deliberately to get wet here?
not much foeuptune or fame either!
Has to be said, a fair number of Roman writers had similar views on the merits of Britain. Yet people did clearly come!
For the hunting dogs, the slaves and the tin, IIRC - was that Caesar or Agricola?
Now there's a question! All important; tin, fwiw, a consistent motivator over time from Bronze Age forward, it would seem!
Understandable with different auxiliaries over time. But confined to strong Roman areas? Hence the concentrated corpses in graves?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.