Problem is, archaeology doesn't deal well with arch invisibility -- def a major issue in 5th-6thC Britain but >
-
-
But that is a problem for locating Frisians in Frisia itself in 5th-6thC >
-
True! However, it nonetheless suggests that ethnonym Frisian was still current in that era, which is arguably a >
-
> point of considerable significance! ;) & in absence of any evidence for them in 4thC Britain, is suggestive :)
-
I will certainly not argue with the significance and suggestiveness of this evidence!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.