...on the downside, repeated ref to 'Dark Ages' & nonsense about how excavations will be of interest to "Arthurian studies"...
-
-
-
...On "Arthurian studies" & Tintagel, really nothing worth adding since Oliver Padel + Charles Thomas wrote c.25yrs ago: connection...
-
....good for tourism, but not historical etc etc etc: see Arthur of the Welsh (Cardiff, 1991) & Tintagel: Arthur+Archaeology (London, 1993).
-
On 'Dark Ages', English Heritage for some reason seen to like, but most ppl who research period really don't...https://twitter.com/caitlinrgreen/status/744822366643990528 …
-
Finally, on British-Byzantine contacts is not too bad :) See https://twitter.com/caitlinrgreen/status/721621412037992448 …, which I'm fitfully working up into a proper article :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
might be interesting to revisit Radfords hypothesis that it is monastic
-
Now that could be a fun bit of revisionism...! Interesting idea! :)
-
not sure it would hold up, but an interesting opportunity for a little light devil's advocacy
-
Always worth doing!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.