Finds+plan from Nanstallon 1stC Roman fort, overlooking R. Camel, Cornwall--incl clenched hand, poss from above gate?pic.twitter.com/SPZdfXofel
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
No, Gwithian=post-Roman and round, Chysauster=Roman and round... but Magor/Tintagel=Rom/post-Rom & square!
any large square stone built houses pre Roman conquest in England,they obv worked in stone,Stonehenge etc.
whose "they" in that sentence? Stonehenge long predates the Celts. And it's round!
they is the Britons,Stonehenge is a very large stone structure obv the Britons worked with stone,why not build houses etc .
"why not" is not terribly scientific evidence. "Britons" is not particularly specific, overly-homogenizing.
Are there no large stone houses pre Roman in GB?,the Britons worked with stone so why not build dwellings from stone.
I think we're miscommunicating. I'm not saying no stone, just no firm cultural boundaries. Square≠Briton, round≠Roman
So you are saying there are large stone dwellings pre the Roman conquest in GB?,square or round don`t matter.
You asked about square & round as indicators of Roman or not; my response it to that. My concern is complexity of interaction
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.