Finds+plan from Nanstallon 1stC Roman fort, overlooking R. Camel, Cornwall--incl clenched hand, poss from above gate?pic.twitter.com/SPZdfXofel
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
A 7thC bar-lug cauldron/cooking pot from Gwithian, Cornwall, in @Cornwall_Museum Gwithian: http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archives/view/gwithian_eh_2007/ …pic.twitter.com/0rQSrrD4Tv
A poss 5/6thC Anglo-Saxon spangle found nr St Michael's Mount, Cornwall in midst of RB finds https://finds.org.uk/database/artefacts/record/id/428272 …pic.twitter.com/2MqCIiRPjA
Re: ‘Anglo-Saxon’ artefacts on Western British sites, this recent paper by Ken Dark offers a brief discussion, fwiw: http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/38512/3/Ken%20Dark%20410.pdf …
@medievalhistory was everything round pre Roman and everything square during and post Roman?
No, Gwithian=post-Roman and round, Chysauster=Roman and round... but Magor/Tintagel=Rom/post-Rom & square!
any large square stone built houses pre Roman conquest in England,they obv worked in stone,Stonehenge etc.
whose "they" in that sentence? Stonehenge long predates the Celts. And it's round!
they is the Britons,Stonehenge is a very large stone structure obv the Britons worked with stone,why not build houses etc .
"why not" is not terribly scientific evidence. "Britons" is not particularly specific, overly-homogenizing.
Are there no large stone houses pre Roman in GB?,the Britons worked with stone so why not build dwellings from stone.
they'd be murder for hanging pictures!
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.