> but Fenwick 1978+Pastscape etc think Viking finds not actually associated with boat AND that boat dates from 17thC http://www.pastscape.org.uk/hob.aspx?hob_id=405588 …
-
-
-
HOWEVER, British Museum+Switsur 1989 both offer completely different C14 results=7th-9thC! http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=3345637&partId=1&people=32864&peoA=32864-3-9&page=1 …pic.twitter.com/hiIMtM1OQ3
-
Thus have 3 entirely different datings circulating in recent scholarly literature, 2 based on radiocarbon: 8thC, 17thC & 'Viking'...! Argh!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
If I didn't know any better I'd say that's an early Hanseatic cog..
-
Interesting, thanks! Is all very confusing---two entirely different C14 dates circulating in literature ;(
-
Don't take my "at a glance" opinion seriously, please. I'm not an expert! Is the confusion because it's well preserved?
-
Mix of poor recording of original find plus bizarrely different reports of radiocarbon results.....!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.