>@caitlinrgreen In a previous conversation between us, on Twitter, you believe that the colonists were English of mixed ethnic origin. >
-
-
Replying to @Ahmed_Aloirati
>
@caitlinrgreen the colonists were mainly of Southern English origin,& they named one of their cities: London; & original London was Roman>1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Ahmed_Aloirati
>
@caitlinrgreen recent studies, as I read in BBC online & in your articles, show how Roman Britain was diversified ethnically.& if we add>1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Ahmed_Aloirati
>
@caitlinrgreen Scandinavian settlers in Britain prior to 1066,it will be OK to call it:English colony,as its heroic founders considered it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
smart mind. :) NB: I had conversation with
@megalithophile about British feet types, I found Egyptian type is the majority>1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
but according to the same article 1/6 of population have Greek type>
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Ahmed_Aloirati @megalithophile
I recall something about that a long time ago, 1990s? Not sure if plausible or not!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
As my own feet are now practically deformed, I definitely don't have a good eye for foot types!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @megalithophile2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
(originally published in Current Archaeology 144, August 1995)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.