A not-especially-plausible defence of the 'Dark Ages' for your reading pleasure :)https://twitter.com/Pseudo_Isidore/status/737551724697681921 …
-
-
I'm sure that's not the first time you have cited Procopius. Makes me feel i need to be more familiar with them
-
He has some fascinating bits: cited some in these two blogs :) http://www.caitlingreen.org/2016/05/anglo-saxon-finds-france-africa.html … & http://www.caitlingreen.org/2016/04/heptarchy-harun-ibn-yahya.html …
-
very interesting. Im still of the opinion tho that the Heptarchy owes most to the Biblical 7 than any reality
-
what of Elmet of Lindsey not to mention the Wealhs kingdoms+if Augustine able to discuss w/other local bishops
-
well, suspect heptarchy is a product of Mercian supremacy, perhaps, forned as idea after loss of Lindsey etc?
-
from Offa days or earlier Wulfhere&brother?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Dark Ages very much annoys me as a term apart from
@JANUSZCZAK using the term smartly to prove it wasnt dark -
is the reason why I discovered Germany Museums
#merovingian your series was eye opener#blessyou
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Dark Ages is a parochial historical era calling which is not even justified Sources exist Lazy I call it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.