@morangles @Rachel5742 Well, it depends on *why^ Gildas mentions it.... Was it because important, or just because in year or birth, or....
-
-
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@caitlinrgreen@morangles given the British context and proximity to events one assume a significant event.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Rachel5742
@Rachel5742@morangles Don't disagree, but debated by several writers; made more difficult by most later refs being derivative of Gildas...!3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@caitlinrgreen@morangles what period were the Welsh annals from? They are a separate thread are they not?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Rachel5742
@Rachel5742@morangles So Alcock used to argue, but no longer so seen---usually linked to 9thC HB and prob 10thC in date :(1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@Rachel5742@morangles Fwiw key text = K. Grabowski+D. N. Dumville, Chronicles and Annals of Medieval Ireland and Wales (Woodbridge 1984) :)1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@caitlinrgreen@morangles where do you stand on the possibility that Arthurian tales relate to the earlier period of Vortigern in the 5th c?2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Rachel5742
@Rachel5742@morangles Fwiw, I would see the main Arthurian tales as folkloric and the historical aspects as derivative of Ambrosius :)1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@caitlinrgreen@morangles Was the economy not more fragmented under Ambrosius than Vortigern and therefore the capacity to fight less?3 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @Rachel5742
@Rachel5742@caitlinrgreen isnt Tintagel w/elts of broken glass suggesting trade in early6thC w/mediterranean link w/Rome not cut that long1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@morangles @Rachel5742 Yes, and with Gaul too! :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.