@caitlinrgreen I am assured by those whose opinions I trust that the protocols are excellent, & the results not botched.
-
-
Replying to @holland_tom
@holland_tom Oh am sure they are :) Just part of normal statistical variability of C14 process afaik, hence multiple measurements needed etc2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@caitlinrgreen The Sana'a fragments were tested in 2 separate laboratories.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @holland_tom
@holland_tom Ah, I see. Well w/ two frags+retest, sounds v interesting! Just thought I'd ask, as know single samples can b v odd on own! :)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@caitlinrgreen@holland_tom everything I've seen published re Sanaa is 650-6701 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DLVLK
@DorothyKing@caitlinrgreen 2 fragments have been C14 dated: one to 543-643, the other to 433-599.2 replies 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @holland_tom
@holland_tom@caitlinrgreen whilst the third test - there were 3 not 2 - said 578-6711 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DLVLK
@DorothyKing@caitlinrgreen Yes, but that was in Arizona. The previous two were in the same Lyon lab.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @holland_tom
@holland_tom maybe@caitlinrgreen would prefer to read it herself http://www.scribd.com/doc/130854520/The-codex-of-a-companion-of-the-Prophet-SAW-Benham-Sadeghi-Bergmann#scribd …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DLVLK
@DorothyKing@holland_tom Thanks have grabbed :) Tbh just spotted as browsing & wondered if single test, as single results may bear little >1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@DorothyKing @holland_tom > relation to actual age, multiple determinations needed to account for normal statistical variation etc :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.