.@caitlinrgreen >this statment in the end of the article …http://worldhistoryconnected.press.illinois.edu/5.2/may.html , I cannot apply on Mongol Empire, it just ended several>
-
-
Replying to @Ahmed_Aloirati
@caitlinrgreen > previous dynasties and led to the creation of new power centers, but was not a catalyst for change from the pre-modern>1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Ahmed_Aloirati
,
@caitlinrgreen >Germanic tribes maybe were catalyst for change from the pre-modern era to the modern era. in Europe when Ended the Western>1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Ahmed_Aloirati
@caitlinrgreen>Roman Empire, but even in this case we should remember there are 1000 yrs between Fall of Rome & Modern Era.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Ahmed_Aloirati
@Archatgs agree to a degree, though note Heather & Hedeager's case for the Huns forcing the 4th/5thC changes....
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@caitlinrgreen "to a degree" it means you have some reservations; can you please tell me your reservations?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Ahmed_Aloirati
@Archatgs that they caused massive changes, but catalyst Huns if follow Heather, + Hedeager argues some 'Germanic' cultural aspects=Hunnic
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@caitlinrgreen Do you have a link for Heather &/or Hedeager?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Ahmed_Aloirati
@caitlinrgreen I think you article http://www.caitlingreen.org/2015/07/were-there-huns-in-anglo-saxon-england.html … has some points related to our subject.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Archatgs Yes, Heather and Hedeager both cited in notes to that piece :)
-
-
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@caitlinrgreen the article is well written. I like your style.0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.