@caitlinrgreen @morangles I agree, but I think Morangles thinks in a big picture, so she avoids the details what we miss it.
-
-
@morangles @Archatgs > over. Lack of proper scholarly apparatus & hand-waving generalisations w/out proper ref to other views/backing up/ > -
@morangles @Archatgs > refs is my main issue, however--further, in general is v idiosyncratic+one-sided, not fully au fait in places w/ AS > -
@morangles @Archatgs > & Celticist research, plus odd interpretations of Gildas's superbus tyrannus and some aspects of AngSax arch etc > -
@morangles @Archatgs > (eg IIRC he puts a major early AS centre where hardly any pre-Viking 'Germanic' material etc). I guess what am > -
@morangles @Archatgs > saying is=fascinating read w/ ideas, but be cautious! :) -
@caitlinrgreen @Archatgs as per xfiles the truth is out there ... and in-between! 5thC Britain+most 6thC is a slate waiting to be deciphered -
@morangles @Archatgs Indeed! Though I think an interdisciplinary approach can help with this ;) -
@caitlinrgreen @Archatgs it will take many disciplines & unexpected discoveries like Sutton Hoo, Staffordshire or Aregundis
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.