> research on this, & etc etc (have moaned in print about this before!). In sum, worth being aware of, but it doesn't actually solve the >
-
-
@DrSueOosthuizen > still issues tho' w/ this & other DNA studies... Also, did he talk about date of admixture/signif intermarrying, as > -
@DrSueOosthuizen > paper puts 250-350 yrs after adventus!! Harke prob happy w/ that, altho' not cited(?), but that's a v v long period for > -
@DrSueOosthuizen > descendants of AS immigrants to have maintained separateness from British popn at large! -
@caitlinrgreen yes.. I wonder how accurate their timescales are - poss more of a range sim to C14? Wd allow a more subtle interpretation -
@DrSueOosthuizen Those dates are at the lower end! Middle date quoted is end of Middle saxon, c.860, if I recall correctly, with range from> -
@DrSueOosthuizen > from c800-915 for admixture (dates from memory as out & about, but def that sort of area!). So potentially 450 yrs after! -
@caitlinrgreen that implies a steady stream of a smaller no of migrants across the 1st mill. Makes sense. Puts paid to Hengest tho :) -
@DrSueOosthuizen Hah! Yes, pondered same, though gets difficult into 7/8C as DNA doesn't allow for signif Scan component but N German...> - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.