> gaps in the data, slightly old-fashioned ideas of nature of AS adventus which doesn't take account or show awareness of modern work & >
-
-
@DrSueOosthuizen > Modern DNA down to c20% (or less), which is interesting, tho have seen similar figures before from other studies. Are > -
@DrSueOosthuizen > still issues tho' w/ this & other DNA studies... Also, did he talk about date of admixture/signif intermarrying, as > -
@DrSueOosthuizen > paper puts 250-350 yrs after adventus!! Harke prob happy w/ that, altho' not cited(?), but that's a v v long period for > -
@DrSueOosthuizen > descendants of AS immigrants to have maintained separateness from British popn at large! -
@caitlinrgreen yes.. I wonder how accurate their timescales are - poss more of a range sim to C14? Wd allow a more subtle interpretation -
@DrSueOosthuizen Those dates are at the lower end! Middle date quoted is end of Middle saxon, c.860, if I recall correctly, with range from> -
@DrSueOosthuizen > from c800-915 for admixture (dates from memory as out & about, but def that sort of area!). So potentially 450 yrs after! -
@caitlinrgreen that implies a steady stream of a smaller no of migrants across the 1st mill. Makes sense. Puts paid to Hengest tho :) - 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.