> First, data in new study suggests the Anglo-Saxons *didn't intermarry with the Britons until the 9thC*! (p.313+supplementary material) >
-
-
@caitlinrgreen paper for example published on modern Europeans using ancient DNA from paeloithic, mesolithic and neolithic (model etc.) -
@caitlinrgreen "Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans" http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25230663 -
@dubhthach fascinating abstract, thank you! :)
-
@caitlinrgreen The full paper is in PDF format in the other tweet (hosted on http://harvard.edu ) -
@dubhthach grabbed and saved for reading later--looks great :) thanks once again!
-
@caitlinrgreen these can be quite terminology rich, but generally not too hard to follow, recent paper from Reich lab about Indo-Europeans -
@caitlinrgreen "“Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages in Europe ”:http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2015/02/10/013433 … -
@caitlinrgreen Published recently in Nature , pdf on http://harvard.edu : http://genetics.med.harvard.edu/reich/Reich_Lab/Welcome_files/nature14317.pdf …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@caitlinrgreen over time yes, the aDNA library is expanding, also work been done on models etc to map ancient samples to modern datasetsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@caitlinrgreen Problem inferring 8c pop from today's: Limited # of genes conserved in each gen. Can have none of gt gt grandmother's.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.