Ok, so I've just finished a quick scan through both the new DNA study @DrDonnaYates mentioned yesterday, along w/ its supplementary info >
-
-
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@caitlinrgreen@DrDonnaYates thanks for perspective. Before I share that article w/ Ts & Ss, can you suggest links to other articles?>1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Wozleigh
@Wozleigh@DrDonnaYates Härke's papers are easily available online, eg. https://www.academia.edu/1178275/Anglo-Saxon_immigration_and_ethnogenesis._Medieval_Archaeology_55_2011._1-28 … & https://www.academia.edu/468159/Evidence_for_an_apartheid-like_social_structure_in_early_Anglo-Saxon_England._Proceedings_of_the_Royal_Society_B_273_July_2006_2651-2657 …. Tbh, the new >2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@Wozleigh@DrDonnaYates > study offers support for Härke's position, tho' it's buried in it; also offers lower figures for the Anglo-Saxon >1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@Wozleigh@DrDonnaYates > contribution to modern genetics, so reduces size of immigration event needed if Härke/Woolf are right that % of >1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@Wozleigh@DrDonnaYates > Anglo-Saxons grew over pre-Viking era to reach modern levels as result of social/political structures :)1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
@Wozleigh @DrDonnaYates (i.e. that immigrant 'Germanic' DNA grew from 5-10% to c.20% of total in S/CentEng, just to be clear on what mean!)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.