Ok, so I've just finished a quick scan through both the new DNA study @DrDonnaYates mentioned yesterday, along w/ its supplementary info >
-
-
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
On the whole, not sure from the perspective of Britons/Anglo-Saxons (my main area) it tells us anything much new--suggests 10%-20% of DNA >
2 replies 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@caitlinrgreen Agree: a lot of this already established using other methods/evidence. Few would have expected much 'Roman DNA' for a start!1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Harry_cartoons
@Harry_cartoons Yes---I mean, it's interesting & supports previous work, but doesn't deal with the actual historical issues of how this >1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@Harry_cartoons > modern DNA relates to events a millennia and a half ago! Tbh, no great surprises at all from my areas of the country, >2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
@Harry_cartoons > and some of the gaps and assumptions just seem wrong, from the perspective of an Anglo-Saxonist :-/
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.