Place-name evidence for Taflas/Taifali as distinct group in 'Anglo-Saxon' Lincolnshire is, of course, interesting in itself...
-
-
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
Supports notion that things rather more complicated than Angles, Saxons+Jutes in post-Roman period... Franks in South, Suevi in East Anglia>
4 replies 5 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
> Elvecones possibly at Elm, and Bede of course mentions Huns in 'Anglo-Saxon England' in Bk 5! Latter esp interesting as Priscus in 5thC >
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
> says Attila claimed domain over islands in the Ocean ;) Taifali add to this sense of a more complicated post-Roman situation, esp as >
3 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
> often described as an "Asiatic", nomadic people....
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
Have to say, do find Bede's claim that the Huns were involved especially intriguing...!
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
Re: the Huns as ancestors of the 8thC Anglo-Saxons, has been argued that Bede clearly intended it read this way and he lists the Huns >
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
> in his second list (HE V.9) immediately before the Saxons, and in this context the Priscus comment that Attila ruled to the islands in >
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
@Tweets2CV Well, Bede does list some of them in HE V.9 too as ancestors of the Anglo-Saxons....!
-
-
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@caitlinrgreen Tribal life at the time is key! The closest I get to it is reading tribal microcom Steel Bonnets, border reiver families!0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.