Was 5/6thC Lincolnshire 'Anglo-Saxon' or 'sub-Roman'? A brief discussion: http://www.caitlingreen.org/2015/01/lincolnshire-anglo-saxon-or-sub-roman.html …pic.twitter.com/4YKthTrItz
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
@caitlinrgreen Certainly think he overplayed the Germanic 'warrior elite' argument & clearly overlooked poss. of higher 'A. Saxon' birthrate
@Harry_cartoons Warrior elite in some areas, perhaps, but not in main Anglian zone? And yes, very probably a key element!
@caitlinrgreen Seems reasonable & wouldn't argue there was NOT a 'warrior elite,' just that it was not SOLELY an elite taking over as FP did
@Harry_cartoons Yes, agreed--Scull had v good paper on this in 1995 & would suspect most A-S specialists would not go for elite-only now :)
@caitlinrgreen @Harry_cartoons often seems to be framed as either/or on mass movements. Seems, as a lay-person, both together explain more?
@MrChris1980 @Harry_cartoons Absolutely---both continuity AND migration works far better than either on their own, imo :)
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.