@Harry_cartoons @lambandflag99 it's regular Old English form, derives from a Late British group and territory name with uncertain suffix >
-
-
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@caitlinrgreen@lambandflag99 Intriguing, and relevant I feel to the complex ways in which the early Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms came into being...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Harry_cartoons
.
@Harry_cartoons@lambandflag99 Indeed. Also phaps worth noting tht Lindissi covered larger area than modern Lindsey.pic.twitter.com/ZQkFmPgQsi
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@caitlinrgreen How did you determine line of the boundary? Is it fairly tightly defined or indicative of a border zone? And in what period?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SurreyMedieval
@SurreyMedieval Think strong argument that Lindissi encompassed areas to south of Lincoln+west of Trent, but exact 'borders' def open to >1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@SurreyMedieval > interpretation :) Chp4 of Britons&Ang-Saxs has more, but based for example on ancient extent of Hatfield+wapentake Newark>1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@SurreyMedieval > (prob once Lincs)+crem cems & their territories etc+extent of Billingas. As to period, 6thC-7thC? Post-679, southern part>1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@SurreyMedieval > prob split off from modern Lindsey by Mercians? (B+ASs, chp5). :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@SurreyMedieval (oh, plus I smoothed the 'border' out on version I posted here, so doesn't have the odd inward turn between Hatfield+Newark)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @caitlinrgreen
@caitlinrgreen Great, I'll reread the chapters with renewed interest when I'm back!1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@SurreyMedieval lol :-) hope you have a fab time away, looks fun!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.