This isn’t an anti. They’re pro-contact
-
-
-
I should’ve paid more attention. Makes WAY more sense now
-
Though it’s not at all any better
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It is unbelievably sloppy to not take sex differences into account. We know sex differences are profound in every other area of sexuality, so why should they disappear as soon as the subject is "sexual abuse"? The fact that sex is a female resource tells me females can't abuse.
-
What are you even talking about? This makes literally no sense at all. If a female rapes a kid, they’ve abused them. End of story.
-
So you are satisfied with dismissing sex differences by a three-word justification, "end of story" and that's it? This is actually something I have thought and written extensively about over the years and you are invited to read for a more reasonable view: https://eivindberge.blogspot.com/2018/12/female-sex-offenders-devils-advocate.html …
-
To sum up the most I can grant you -- and that's being generous! -- is that females can sexually abuse but not exploit. You need at a minimum to separate out all the exploitation elements from their supposed sex crimes before ending up with anything that has any merit at all.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Denying female to male rape is the levels I expect these people to go down to tbh
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.