Caitlin

@caitlinmap

I give my thoughts and opinions from a staunch Anti-Contact MAP perspective - SFW - Non-Offending MAP - Anti-Contact - Female - She/Her - DMs Open

Joined December 2018

Tweets

You blocked @caitlinmap

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @caitlinmap

  1. Pinned Tweet
    30 Dec 2018

    Approaching 100 followers and it hasn't even been a month since making this account, thanks to everyone willing to hear me out as well as my friends. I appreciate the love.

    Undo
  2. Retweeted
    8 hours ago

    People are, in general, more likely to believe things if they want them to be true. Related statement: Unfortunate as it is, children are harmed far too often by sexual relationships with adults. We as MAPs need to recognize our own potential for cognative bias on this issue.

    Undo
  3. 2 hours ago

    Education can’t make a kid’s brain develop years in advance with just a few lessons. Kids can say the word “yes” or “no” but that doesn’t mean they can consent meaningfully to sexual actions with an adult. Kids do not have the mental development yet, it comes with age.

    Undo
  4. 10 hours ago

    Seeing someone say “Females can’t abuse” is a sign I have done too much internet for today, so I am logging off. If the pro-c’s say anything more stupid I’d appreciate making your own arguments against them as well. Goodnight.

    Undo
  5. 10 hours ago

    Females can rape. Males can be raped by females. Female on Male rape exists. There can be harm to ANY sexual contact depending on a variety of factors. What is it with you and thinking these ridiculous thoughts?

    Undo
  6. 11 hours ago

    No, it’s only “evident” they can consent if you’re letting your perversions clouding your rationality and morality. While I have my thoughts and attractions, I have the self control to oppose these things and accept the reality we can’t always have what we want.

    Undo
  7. Retweeted
    12 hours ago

    Imagine thinking: 1. Kids can somehow consent 2. Think there is no aggressor when adults fuck kids 3. Sexual violence is ONLY when theres physical violence (I guess manipulation and psychological intimidation doesn’t count) 4. Adult-child sexual contact isnt automatically rape

    Show this thread
    Undo
  8. Retweeted

    FLIP YOUR PHONE ˙ʍou sʇɹɐʇs ʞǝǝʍ ʇsɹoʍ ɹnoʎ 'sıɥʇ ʇǝǝʍʇǝɹ ʇ,uop noʎ ɟI ˙ʇɥɓıuoʇ sʍǝu pooɓ ploʇ ǝq llıʍ noʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ǝɔuıS

    Undo
  9. 14 hours ago

    It seems like a few people were suddenly suspended without clear reason or warning, I hope this isn’t a purge or something.

    Undo
  10. 22 hours ago

    Antis, making fake accounts is pointless. We aren’t hiding anything, our group chats don’t have anything of interest, we won’t have anything to say in DMs worth exposing. There’s literally nothing to “infiltrate” in non-contact MAP circles, it’s a waste of time and just sad tbh.

    Undo
  11. 22 hours ago

    An important part of convincing antis to focus on pro-contacts and those contributing to CP distribution is to respect if they don’t want anything to do with us, but won’t harm us. If we try to integrate everyone who doesn’t attack us into our community, it’ll be worse for us.

    Undo
  12. 23 hours ago

    For a short period of time I thought I was otherkin and it was very strange.

    Undo
  13. Jan 4

    She just seemed so friendly and had genuinely good takes to discuss about MAPs while remaining consistent on her anti-contact stances. Her ban really wasn't justified.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  14. Jan 4

    I really miss and hope she is okay.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  15. Retweeted
    Jan 4

    Again, this is why I won’t make any more tweets on anti-contacts anymore. Those that condone CP, contact, and abuse are far more worth targetting and exposing than those who are on the side side as us in that they oppose the same things we do, even if they have that attraction.

    Undo
  16. Jan 4

    If you follow me and post/retweet/like/DM child porn, I will report you for CSEM material to Twitter and other sites and immediately block you. I may be a MAP, I don’t condone or support the continuing of abuse that goes into producing it. If you do, fuck off please.

    Undo
  17. Retweeted
    Jan 3
    Replying to

    I think it is a mistake to think that coercion has to be physical.

    Undo
  18. Jan 3

    Coercion is a form of physical force.

    Undo
  19. Jan 2

    However, I have dealt with enough pro-contacts to know you’re a liar. You’ll never concede, you’ll never agree, you won’t admit you’re wrong. Any evidence supplied to you is wrong because you guys change the definition of what “child sex abuse” is on the spot.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  20. Undo
  21. Jan 2

    It’s the case most of the time, there’s always outliers and blips in data. Next time though, don’t try to gain an authority in a conversation by saying the word “evidence” and not even cite anything. Evidence isn’t “not all cases so you are wrong.”

    Show this thread
    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·