In "Plutocrats," @cafreeland refers to Paul Ryan as a "Conservative intellectual." Do we agree on that, or is Ryan getting too much credit?
-
@catawu IMHO@cafreeland was attempting to avoid being overtly biased against Republicans; book was focusing on analyzing the superwealthy.
-
-
@cafreeland@rugcernie I just don't get where he can be considered an intellectual on any level. A charlatan, a fraud, but ... oh well. -
@catawu While I don't agree with@cafreeland's assessment of Paul Ryan, I understand why it was necessary in the book's context.#Plutocrats
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@cafreeland@rugcernie forwarding the false memes of who is what is half the problem IMO. But I think we've covered that.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.