Why should researchers be non-liable for their actions? Are they priests? Counsel? What is this safe harbour and where is she writ?https://twitter.com/aridavidpaul/status/969647576030105600 …
would love to hear your thoughts on this thread.https://twitter.com/IOHK_Charles/status/970219087639977984?s=20 …
-
-
Same thing - creating some special non-liability safe harbour for any group of people just creates a new priesthood.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One problem I am concerned with here is gap between research and brand-attack. Much research done on big brand targets - why is that?
-
maybe because big brand targets = big honeypot (in terms of exposure).
-
:-) exactly. And researchers want special rights to pump up their careers on big brand breaches? No thanks.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.