If you are not a miner, you are not BY definition a full node.
-
-
Replying to @ProfFaustus @FedericoTenga and
A user node influences nothing. Changes Nothing Alerts nothing impacts nothing.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ProfFaustus @FedericoTenga and
aside from the Bitcoin whitepaper. do you have a detailed technical article which expound and prove this point? reason i ask is that
@adam3us and other Bitcoin evangelists insist that user nodes help secure the network. i’d love to see a debate on this.#Bitcoin#StoreOfDrama2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @c4chaos @FedericoTenga and
The code... it is a good start Here is something. Debate means nothing. This is science and fact. It does or does not. That is testable empirically. Rhetoric, no value
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ProfFaustus @FedericoTenga and
so demonstrate the science and fact. and then reference it for everyone to see. this way, any attempt at rhetoric can be easily dispelled by a simple reference.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @c4chaos @FedericoTenga and
I have. The fact you seek to ignore what is clear and obvious is not my issue. I really do not care if many of the the BTC crowd are all enlightened. The simplest point is, non mining nodes do not up[date the network. The rest I have covered
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ProfFaustus @FedericoTenga and
the fact is that Bitcoin maximalists and evangelists have convinced practically everyone that non-mining nodes contribute in securing the network. the onus is on experts and people like you to prove them wrong with facts and science.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @c4chaos @ProfFaustus and
hawks5999 Retweeted Alberto Brandolini
Or what? Let BTC persist with their geocentric-quality science. They will kill themselves off. Better to stay focused on moving forward with the heliocentric-quality of BCH and not get weighed down in an asymmetric debate:https://twitter.com/ziobrando/status/289635060758507521 …
hawks5999 added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hawks5999 @ProfFaustus and
there’s no “or what”. there’s just the fact that Bitcoin maximalists & evangelists who write books and do videos/podcasts have spread the information that running full (non-mining) nodes contribute in securing the network. ergo it becomes de facto “truth” unless debunked.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @c4chaos @ProfFaustus and
There is no de facto truth. “Truth is singular. Its ‘versions’ are mistruths” -Somni-451
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
you can say that to yourself over and over and that will be your version of “truth”. my point stands.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.