The only spectrum of rational thinking that can be done is through a *singular* logic. Polylogism is the absence of thinking and the acceptance of the irrational.
-
-
No, there are just an infinite number of goalposts, but any two posts remain those two. You have confounded the many with the individual, both exist
-
More i thought, the more i like it and its simplicity. In order to even engage in discourse & argumentation we must define specific goalposts. The intention is not to declare there isnt an infinite # of posts (straw man).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So it's impossible to model a theoretical that has an answer? There are no answers, but what you say is right? Interesting
-
no. you assume that i believe that what I say is right. see Tetralemma logic.
-
One really large problem. Tetralemma logic is provably wrong. No time now, but logic theoy has come a long way in 3000 years and those problem they like to think on are not always problems any more. Much of the negation and infinite is now solved mathematically, so.. sorry
-
maybe you can discuss this with my dharma teacher
@ShinzenYoung. he is a mathematician.#hardcoredharmahttps://www.shinzen.org/mathematics-for-mystics-welcome-to-my-geek-out/ … -
Would love to one of these days when I have time :)
-
i’m not a mathematician. so i can just hang out and serve you guys alcohol while i check
@CoinMarketCap in the background

#hardcoredharma -
LOL I have some, but my maths starts to suffer under the universal forces of scotch
-
my bane is tequila

btw, coincidentally, my dharma teacher @ShinzenYoung is also a linguist and he’s fluent in speaking and writing Japanese. so there
https://youtu.be/iVFJznSgLd8 #hardcoredharma
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.