The code is the authoritative reference to what happened, and I already linked you to that. Are you unwilling to believe it, or unable to understand it?
-
-
Unable to understand, it seems. Because I look at it and see that the articles were right.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Perhaps you could point to the lines that "invalidate previous transactions", then.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Perhaps.
#Ethereum is complex, finding the lines will take some time.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The DAO fork was simple. It's just the hundred or so lines I linked you to.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
A rollback can be done even without leaving traces in the source code, orphaned blocks hint about that possibility. "The code is the authoritative reference to what happened" is a wrong claim in our not purely stateless world.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Oookay. Sure. Good luck on your conspiracy hunt.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nicksdjohnson @c___f___b and
On the plus side, I guess this means you *do* agree there's a meaningful difference between the DAO HF and a rollback.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Sorry, I don't agree.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Really? You just pointed out that one would literally erase history and the other would not. You can see why I think it's important to clarify the nature of the DAO hard fork.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
interesting discussion. perhaps #EthereumClassic folks can chime in with their perspective. maybe @IOHK_Charles can provide his perspective.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.