IOTA does have some really great "partnerships" and by "partnerships" I of course mean they're customers.https://thenextweb.com/hardfork/2017/12/12/iota-partnership-microsoft-marketplace/ …
-
-
I've never really appreciated those types. I think they often bully and bluster their way past legitimate objections. Especially in building an open and decentralized platform that's a dangerous trait not a useful one. Just because they "win" doesn't make them right.
-
When I speak of betrayal I refer to the claim that they intentionally left bad code in their open source in order to sabotage or delay forks? Dangerous to open source and the opposite of the behavior we should support. If it was even true and not just a claim to cover for a bug
-
It was true, to protect from people who would copy verbatim their code. You can see it as bad, but it didn't compromise their the network
-
You don't see that as completely against the spirit and purpose of open source?
-
thus if someone really wants to start their own tangle, they can start from scratch, otherwise contribute to the open sourced iota tangle
-
I think you might be conflating open source and public. IOTA's chain is public, but the code is what would be open source. By intentionally not revealing the true code, they are not really open source. The benefits of open source fall more to the public, it speeds innovation
-
IOTA’s code is public. that’s why the so-called “vulnerabilities” was “discovered”. more on this here:https://medium.com/@mistywind/iota-cofounder-sergey-ivancheglo-aka-come-from-beyonds-responses-to-the-ongoing-fud-about-so-ea3afd51a79b …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.



