They do. The claim that they don't is not evidenced. This is science. You cannot make idle claims without evidence or you end with trash such as Selfish mining. Unsupported assertions based on untested claims. That is a common problem in crypto. Few call ppl out as they cannot
-
-
Haha, hearing the guy who proclaimed to be Satoshi without providing evidence talk about evidence is almost too funny to even express.
3 replies 5 retweets 62 likes -
Replying to @DavidSonstebo @ProfFaustus and
instead of responding to his attack with an argument, you attacked him at a personal level....
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @DavidSelovin @DavidSonstebo and
personal attacks aside, i’d love to see a take down of CSW’s criticism of
$IOTA and mesh networks. if he’s wrong, then it would be lovely and EPIC to point out how wrong he is
1 reply 2 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @c4chaos @DavidSelovin and
I would love to see it. I have referenced so many papers it is not funny. More, we are writing R code for testing that will be out in 2018. I am not in a rush, things need to be done right and we have a lonnnnggggg runway
2 replies 1 retweet 14 likes -
Replying to @ProfFaustus @DavidSelovin and
i’m all for math and science and evidence. as far as i know,
$IOTA has access to supercomputers which simulate different scenarios for the#Tangle. so it should be doable to theoretically prove that IOTA can scale securely.1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @c4chaos @DavidSelovin and
Wrong information and bad models test nothing
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @ProfFaustus @DavidSelovin and
i’d love to see a technical debate/discussion on this between math and science geeks. the advanced mathematics is surely above my pay grade. but at least i’m open to watch a technical smack down without the personal attacks.


$IOTA1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @c4chaos @DavidSelovin and
I know, looks cool. Each validation (n) of a transaction increases the likelihood of a transaction being genuine, up to a threshold of (c). And again, a loose mesh and easy to sybil at scale. To test 5 billion people means more nodes than any HPC in the next 30 years can runpic.twitter.com/fDafb4Bc6i
3 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ProfFaustus @c4chaos and
Oh, I forgot, in that image from the IOTA site, the graph breaches the rules. Not a good diagrammatic rep of their own system. I will leave you tho think of why for now.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
btw, just to set the context right. $IOTA is a protocol for machine to machine transactions, not people. but obviously, if free tx are good for machines then the people will follow because economics
@DavidSonstebo @DomSchiener @c___f___b
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.