Please go on Mr. Satoshi, what deep insight have you seen that numerous math PhDs has not? We would pay you a hefty sum to point it out.
-
-
I know, looks cool. Each validation (n) of a transaction increases the likelihood of a transaction being genuine, up to a threshold of (c). And again, a loose mesh and easy to sybil at scale. To test 5 billion people means more nodes than any HPC in the next 30 years can runpic.twitter.com/fDafb4Bc6i
-
A double spend is probabilistic. More, it can be gamed (and no, I have seen zero on testing this). You set validators that act to validate and forward your own TXs. Yes, you can do this. Economically it is cheap. The system can be attacked for not much investment at all.
-
To attack, you form a ring of controlled strongly connected components. Tarjan's strongly connected components algorithm would be enough to help with the structure, I could think of more if I bothered to care. I do not. This is only a few minutes thought.
-
now that
$IOTA is mooning, then the bounty is uber lucrative. so to whoever can make this attack then IOTA Devs will just say, BRING IT

-
Margins. If you think that is mooning... you have no idea of value yet.
-
i have an idea. the Internet of Things
#IoT will be a multi-trillion dollar economy
good luck with #BitcoinCash catching up to that

https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS42799917 … -
Good luck with IOTA... nothing to catch up with ;)
-
i love your fighting spirit. go for it! competition is good. compete or perish!
#cryptosssets

End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.