i’m not saying that we *should*. i’m describing how it *could* likely happen, with our without our approval. because Power abhors a vacuum.
-
-
Replying to @c4chaos
Well that's a different convo. You said it "can't" happen without government regulation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @7heAbolitionist
~C4Chaos Retweeted ~C4Chaos
that’s not what I said. here’s what i said.https://twitter.com/c4chaos/status/916692222791245825 …
~C4Chaos added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @c4chaos @7heAbolitionist
sensible regulations don’t mean adding more regulations. it means embracing and adapting by retiring old regulations that no longer apply.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @c4chaos
well, that's why I kept saying define 'sensible regulations'. When ppl say 'we need sensible gun regs' it means adding more regulations.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @7heAbolitionist @c4chaos
In fact, you are the first person I've encountered that thought 'sensible regs' doesn't mean adding more regs that are "sensible".
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @7heAbolitionist
if you don’t want the word “sensible”, substitute “reasonable.” “reasonableness” is the bedrock of human laws.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @c4chaos
Maybe, but I'd side with Voltaire on this when accepting 'sensible' or 'reasonable' laws:pic.twitter.com/tO7HOgkouB
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @7heAbolitionist
that’s why laws are complex, complicated, and with loop holes. imagine humans imposing codes on other humans!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @c4chaos
But in a very real way, they already do. :) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Code …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
there’s always a chance of rebooting this current simulation. but that’s another deep rabbit hole.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.