there will be many blockchains, DLTs. cryptos. it’s naive to think that there’s going to be one blockchain to rule them all.
-
-
Replying to @c4chaos
I don't think there will be, & I'm very much against that ideology. '1 ring to rule them all' was the reason the ring had to be destroyed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @7heAbolitionist @c4chaos
Lord of the Rings was about anarchy. You can't be sensible with absolute power.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @7heAbolitionist
tough luck. Power abhors a vacuum. there will always be nodes and super nodes of power. deal with it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @c4chaos @7heAbolitionist
there are few startups looking at the BIG PICTURE of blockchains, cryptos, & DAGs.
#Tenx#COMIT is one of the fewhttps://youtu.be/xULhohcCRKE1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @c4chaos
What are you talking about? How are you suggesting I'm against any coins? I'm in favor of tons of ppl working on ways to control crypto.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @7heAbolitionist
my original point is: sensible regulations that adapt to tech will reduce friction in crypto adoption. but not disappear altogether.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @c4chaos
Well this is still wrong in my view, but not so wrong that it's worth debating.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @7heAbolitionist
the essence of my point is this: codes are for machines. laws are for humans. if you want to follow codes instead of laws, be a machine.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @c4chaos
Let's just end w/ your clarified definition that we are pretty much on the same page & team. :)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
good. because 140 character limit just sucks BIG TIME! 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.