lol. No. 0 regulations isn't *sensible* regulations. It is the absence of regulation.
there will be many blockchains, DLTs. cryptos. it’s naive to think that there’s going to be one blockchain to rule them all.
-
-
if you can’t hold that multiple perspectives and cognitive dissonance in your own brain then you’re not looking at the big picture.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't think there will be, & I'm very much against that ideology. '1 ring to rule them all' was the reason the ring had to be destroyed.
-
Lord of the Rings was about anarchy. You can't be sensible with absolute power.
-
tough luck. Power abhors a vacuum. there will always be nodes and super nodes of power. deal with it.
-
there are few startups looking at the BIG PICTURE of blockchains, cryptos, & DAGs.
#Tenx#COMIT is one of the fewhttps://youtu.be/xULhohcCRKE -
What are you talking about? How are you suggesting I'm against any coins? I'm in favor of tons of ppl working on ways to control crypto.
-
my original point is: sensible regulations that adapt to tech will reduce friction in crypto adoption. but not disappear altogether.
-
Well this is still wrong in my view, but not so wrong that it's worth debating.
-
the essence of my point is this: codes are for machines. laws are for humans. if you want to follow codes instead of laws, be a machine.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.